Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:03:50 +0100 From: vladimir konrad <v.konrad@lse.ac.uk> To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended SATA controllers Message-ID: <20070524100351.1db4f3f1@whirpool.lse.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070522200806.GA10962@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0705181803340.365@gee5.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> <cone.1179528158.971883.82263.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <Pine.OSX.4.64.0705181932290.365@gee5.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> <200705191056.25359.groot@kde.org> <7EEE81A5-4D8D-46FB-87C8-D192C7B55EE7@altesco.nl> <20070521221941.GB86033@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <20070522093631.63049206@whirpool.lse.ac.uk> <20070522200806.GA10962@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_OqArNjoheFVWoj6uvqABJtJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > are you sure that they are not SiI 3114 ? i had similar discussion > > on this list a while ago and 3114 was said to be the "good one" > > and the 3112 the "bad one". >=20 > Yup. Just checked the hotstamp on the chip: 3112. Is it possible > that some boards which used the 3112 chip were made and that those > manufacturing problems have been since fixed? it is possible that both - the hardware and FreeBSD support for it improved to the point, when it makes no difference whether it is 3112 or 3114... (but i am not sure about it) vlad --Sig_OqArNjoheFVWoj6uvqABJtJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGVVT35mQ6ItFTZ8gRAjPKAJ9UahWkvZKOGBR2anW2ZQp3SnbSjACeICex lTTRUluudcDyF7ak4LfblYw= =Wfx8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_OqArNjoheFVWoj6uvqABJtJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070524100351.1db4f3f1>