Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:52:02 +0100
From:      Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
To:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not...
Message-ID:  <401267700.20050215065202@wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg>
References:  <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AF9@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <961491707.20050215024555@wanadoo.fr> <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erich Dollansky writes:

> I do not understand why it has to be promoted like this at all.

It doesn't _have_ to be, but advocacy is all about promotion.

> FreeBSD itself ist just a plain operating system.

Every operating system has its strengths and weaknesses.

> As long as the programs needed for a certain purpose are in the ports,
> FreeBSD is the choice.

Hardly.  It might be possible to get MVS to run on a PDA, but that
doesn't mean that MVS is the choice for a PDA operating system.

-- 
Anthony




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401267700.20050215065202>