From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 05:52:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B21D16A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:52:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4176743D58 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6F7EA1C00098 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:52:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5389A1C0008F for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:52:02 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050215055202342.5389A1C0008F@mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:52:02 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <401267700.20050215065202@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AF9@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <961491707.20050215024555@wanadoo.fr> <42115F49.70908@pacific.net.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:52:03 -0000 Erich Dollansky writes: > I do not understand why it has to be promoted like this at all. It doesn't _have_ to be, but advocacy is all about promotion. > FreeBSD itself ist just a plain operating system. Every operating system has its strengths and weaknesses. > As long as the programs needed for a certain purpose are in the ports, > FreeBSD is the choice. Hardly. It might be possible to get MVS to run on a PDA, but that doesn't mean that MVS is the choice for a PDA operating system. -- Anthony