From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 19:09:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E98716A6BA for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2976244770 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:50:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from sp34.ipt.ru ([217.147.20.50] helo=bs2.sp34.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GH3Ek-0004Ar-Qc; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:50:30 +0400 Received: from bsam by bs2.sp34.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GH3K8-0000Cr-13; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:56:04 +0400 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <44EFE1F6.40505@siol.net> <20060826104928.16b4a5a1@localhost> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:56:03 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060826104928.16b4a5a1@localhost> (Stanislav Sedov's message of "Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:49:28 +0400") Message-ID: <35991116@bs2.sp34.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with man pages: fsf-funding.7, gfdl.7, gpl.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:09:11 -0000 On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:49:28 +0400 Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:53:58 +0200 > Karel Miklav mentioned: > > The GCC compiler suite includes above mentioned man pages. Current GCC > > ports just remove them after installation. I'd like to keep them > > installed in a non-conflicting manner, but versioning doesn't seem like > > the best idea: man 7 gpl-gnat-gcc41? Or: man 7 fsf-funding-gnat-gcc41? > > > > What do you think? Do I have other options? > devel/powerpc-gcc port leaves them by installing into different prefix. > In your case I see no other solution besides versioning. It seems to > me not very bad idea to appeal to versioned man-page for versioned gcc - > it looks quite natural. +1 WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru, Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org, The Power To Serve