From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 19:35:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADCA106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90685152CFC; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F51210E.3040104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:35:42 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konstantin Belousov References: <20120228211513.GD99283@azathoth.lan> <4F4D44F0.9060901@FreeBSD.org> <20120228223656.GF99283@azathoth.lan> <4F509414.3070605@FreeBSD.org> <20120302094710.GD75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4F51133C.7030902@FreeBSD.org> <20120302184931.GM75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120302190217.GN75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120302192152.GQ75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20120302192152.GQ75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freddie Cash , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:35:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/02/2012 11:21, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > The renames of the libGL.so inside the packages are orthohonal to > package splits. The issue is that libGL.so.1 installed by both packages > (graphics/libGL and x11/nvidia-driver). And not that the nvidia-driver > contains some other stuff. Right, I see your point. If the symlink solution is used, slave ports are likely unnecessary. Another question that occurred to me, has anyone tested that ports built against one version of the GL stuff can safely be run if the other version suddenly appears at runtime? - -- This .signature sanitized for your protection -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPUSEOAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE7rUIAJTF/d/aPffPT/4crdMDxYlo 8rQnDoZq+bE2Ona9jg3jZT1ZR3EmU8i8x2nubTUkd2r2y2+kEyZEy4VxWREaXN/t z0fqUFR9vmTl4DzxSNpHyNeFau9OU59B8CiLuUCDkHt/ypELmEyXvpqBjFI9aAHq 84wCYFrW6iOgVWLhefyKgAUbhFrJRp52v6TqNFQ7CmSW7AVgGqaNjb5m2d3nuUGH J0gtvifPdShnRorKIVDQ+3dRiry5LSRQTn6YeZBqkpOjJh3XO4AQhu9vmqOFp0wv tG1sknVt8R93FfPMa6wh7FP/W4JroGZNqVRmjdPkGLl6KrHuLTlApgs2BzVXe6k= =KVee -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----