From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 7 23:48:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA24917 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 23:48:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA24912 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 23:48:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA85020; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 23:48:09 -0800 (PST) To: "Jason C. Wells" cc: FreeBSD-chat Subject: Re: Beta Testers For Applixware? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Dec 1998 17:56:32 PST." Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 23:48:08 -0800 Message-ID: <85016.913103288@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > "FreeBSD is not going to be a pick your binary format system," stated by > sources unremembered. I think it's a bit early to speculate about the binary formats we'll be releasing Applixware in and that's probably enough said. > 3.0 _is_ RELEASE. Maybe we should treat it as such. I get the feeling the > 3.0-RELEASE is the redheaded step child of the FreeBSD world. "Sure we put > it on our web page but you might want to run 2.2.8 instead." No, it's simply what happens with every .0 release and happened as well with 2.0.0, 2.1.0 and 2.2.0. Most of those getting worried about 3.0's "special status" are newcomers with little sense of history. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message