Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:28:51 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Subject: Fwd: Re: Only one idea about php4 Message-ID: <200411120228.52050.freebsd@redesjm.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, mail problems. This was sent days ago. =2D--------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- Subject: Re: Only one idea about php4 Date: Mi=E9rcoles, 27 de Octubre de 2004 23:09 =46rom: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@redesjm.local> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org>, Nika Vidal <nikageek@gmail.com>,=20 ports@freebsd.org El Martes, 26 de Octubre de 2004 19:30, Alex Dupre escribi=F3: > Nika Vidal wrote: > > The way that I actually use them is compiling php with static > > mocules and I get mysql support but gd support seems to be > > impossible lol. > > > > I only try to tell that could be a good idea having this 2 options, > > dynamic and static modules. > > Having 2 options doesn't solve your problem and it's not the right > thing to do. Read ports/UPDATING to solve your problem. I recall having those problems in rpms. We end making a strong base with all the critical things into. Maybe your approach to the new 'php ports' is 'too lineal'. =BFWhat about making those critical components 'strong parts' of the base php and use static link if required? =2D- josemi =2D------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411120228.52050.freebsd>