From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 7 8:56:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FC537B421; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:56:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g27GuCK57591; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:56:12 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g27GtCRV023603; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:55:12 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200203071655.g27GtCRV023603@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5-CURRENT source upgrade path is broken in PAM References: <3C8799F2.13E4E3F6@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3C8799F2.13E4E3F6@FreeBSD.org> ; from Maxim Sobolev "Thu, 07 Mar 2002 18:48:50 +0200." Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:55:11 +0000 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > That is _my_ fault, not DES'. It was a crypt() problem which I have fixed. > > Ok, I see now. Could we please make a rule to send a heads-up in such > cases (i.e. in the cases when some serious misbehaviour was introduced > and then fixed shortly). This would save me (and probably others) > roughly a hour that I spent debugging what's going wrong. My apologies. I should have thought to do that. I'll remember if there is a next time ;-) M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message