From owner-p4-projects Wed Dec 4 9:19:16 2002 Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 16A0337B404; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:19:15 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E16937B401 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:19:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail15.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263D843EC5 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:19:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 11230 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 17:19:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail15.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 4 Dec 2002 17:19:17 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB4HJBuH041344; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:19:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20021204071432.GA1920@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:19:19 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 21897 for review Cc: perforce@freebsd.org, User Takawata Sender: owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 04-Dec-2002 Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:37:20PM +0900, User Takawata wrote: >> In message <200212040607.gB467dlf011494@repoman.freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar >> wrote: >> >> > I renamed rsdt to sdt where it makes sense, but long >> > exposure to ACPI tends to annihilate ones sensibility :-) >> >> SDT is the acronym for System Descriptor Table and not only for >> RSDT or XSDT. I think the name 'rootsdt' is better. > > [I'm amazed by the exposure my work has, while I don't get to see > any changes from others. Probably some configuration thingy...] > > I see. If rootsdt is what it is, then rsdt isn't really a bad name > (provided of course we abstract the fact that xsdt is just a > 64-bit variant of the rootsdt). > > Do you think I should revert back to rsdt or should I convert] > to rootsdt? I think just going back to rsdt would be best. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message