From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  1 19:40:58 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48544EFF
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00884171
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F4125D3810;
 Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de
 [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C5FC22B96;
 Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de
Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587])
 by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de
 [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hR2bWhF4U6vF; Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4410:590a:5d80:8a04:284f] (unknown
 [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4410:590a:5d80:8a04:284f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7FD6C22C67;
 Tue,  1 Apr 2014 19:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: make WITH[OUT]_* more useful?
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:40:18 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net>
To: Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 19:40:58 -0000


On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote:

> # NO_* takes precedence
> # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless
> # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes"
> # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default.
> and
> MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error.
...
> Thoughts?

I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again =
rather than reducing it.  I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die.

=97=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb                             ????????? ??? ??????? ??????:
'??? ??? ???? ??????  ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ????
?????? ?? ????? ????',  ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.???