From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri May 8 21:13:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA18835 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flea.best.net (root@flea.best.net [206.184.139.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA18824; Fri, 8 May 1998 21:13:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@flea.best.net) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by flea.best.net (8.8.8/8.7.3) id VAA10624; Fri, 8 May 1998 21:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 21:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <199805090412.VAA10624@flea.best.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: phk@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/5197 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org : :Synopsis: The swapper is ineffective : :State-Changed-From-To: open-closed :State-Changed-By: phk :State-Changed-When: Fri May 8 13:45:05 PDT 1998 :State-Changed-Why: :Doing what you suggest would prevent the swapper from acting as :last defense against low-mem conditions. I belive the future of :the swapper is generally uncertain with a tendency to "kill it!" :being mumbled. (Look for NO_SWAPPING in the -current vmcode). I think the -2.2.x and -current trees already have the swap-out-code-sleeping-over-N-seconds committed, so even though you completely misunderstood the PR, the bug report should be closed for other reasons anyway. -Matt Matthew Dillon Engineering, BEST Internet Communications, Inc. [always include a portion of the original email in any response!] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message