Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:14:39 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES Message-ID: <20031029210945.A86732@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20031029.220629.102576808.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031028235425.N82902@root.org> <20031029.013316.32322618.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031029.220629.102576808.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20031029100945.F84859@root.org> > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > : On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <20031028235425.N82902@root.org> > : > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > : > : Is this needed? options alone should be sufficient and acpi_wakeup.S > : > : should include opt_acpi.h. > : > > : > Not for kernel modules... > : > : Muagh. > : > : Ok, I'm starting a pot for whoever will finally implement the combined > : kernel modules and kernel config build tree. $10 US via PayPal. Care to > : contribute? > > Not for this. Options for kernel compilation should only really be > used for ABI issues. better to make this a tunable/sysctl. Non-sequitur. The issue still stands that module builds don't pull in the kernel config file, forcing duplication in make.conf. When building a kernel+modules, options in opt_*.h should be included in the module build. This is even under the 5.2-TODO as "Revised kld build infrastructure". I was just indicating that the number of times this has bothered me was worth $10 to the author of the fix. Maybe it's bothered enough others that it's worth a few hundred $ aggregate. :) I'll up it to $20. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031029210945.A86732>