Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:55 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Maurizio Marini <maurizio.marini@cost.it> Cc: FreeBSD Net <net@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, Manuel Martini <posta@manuelmartini.it>, Giovanni Mattera <giovanni.mattera@cost.it> Subject: Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v Message-ID: <0968D615-5C7A-4D38-A441-676B05BE2A61@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140304184303.0b34e865@tikal.homenet.telecomitalia.it> References: <77152523.5202330.1393757388176.JavaMail.zimbra@cost.it> <531456AA.50203@freebsd.org> <20140303122850.212f8c18@tikal.homenet.telecomitalia.it> <1393945740.22165.90432305.73C1DA68@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1492436824.5843722.1393949513726.JavaMail.zimbra@cost.it> <2AFDF12C-2655-484E-A217-6BBC2FC5E4A4@FreeBSD.org> <20140304184303.0b34e865@tikal.homenet.telecomitalia.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:43, Maurizio Marini <maurizio.marini@cost.it> = wrote: > "But shouldn't the CARP state go to "master" anyway, even if it = couldn't find a > live partner due to network/Hyper-V problems?" >=20 > this is the question, forget network/Hyper-V problems, CARP should go = MASTER > anyway I will have to test again in that XenServer environment soon but I = believe it also stayed INIT there unless you forced it to MASTER. I = could be wrong, though. You're right though -- it should go to MASTER if it can't talk to the = other members.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0968D615-5C7A-4D38-A441-676B05BE2A61>