From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 18 00:14:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B5A16B264 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-4.paradise.net.nz (bm-4a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B454F43D7E for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:14:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-4.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZF00FXZQ0MCF@linda-4.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:14:46 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-29-139.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.29.139]) by smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB686D5C790; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:14:45 +1200 (NZST) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:14:45 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <446AC35C.2090304@paradise.net.nz> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <446BBC75.6040407@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <446AC35C.2090304@paradise.net.nz> Cc: Subject: Re: Sequantial IO Performance improvement in 6.1-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:14:52 -0000 Mark Kirkwood wrote: > I recently upgraded my FreeBSD machines from 6.0R to 6.1-STABLE > > I noticed a pleasant surprise - improved disk IO! > > In 6.0R best sequential throughput I ever saw was 170 MB/s (32k block > size reads on an 4G file). In 6.1-STABLE I'm seeing 190 Mb/s (32k block > size reads on an 4G file). > Would have been even better if I'd spelled "sequential" correctly in the subject :-(... I'm also seeing sequential write speed increasing from 120Mb/s to 140Mb/s. I did wonder if this increased IO throughput is what is triggering the posts about data corruption in 6.1 - i.e. more throughput means more heat to dissipate! Cheers Mark