Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:45 -0500
From:      Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Reducing the need to compile a custom kernel
Message-ID:  <20120210141945.GA1848@glenbarber.us>
In-Reply-To: <20120210145604.Horde.ewjpSpjmRSRPNSH0YRHxgAk@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <20120210145604.Horde.ewjpSpjmRSRPNSH0YRHxgAk@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you  
> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out  
> debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options  
> which you add which you can not add as a module (SW_WATCHDOG comes to  
> my mind)? If yes, which ones and how important are they for you?
> 

For me, the two big ones are IPSEC (which, as I understand it, we cannot
ship with GENERIC due to export laws), and KDB_UNATTENDED.  The latter
may be a sysctl tunable, I never bothered to look.

Regards,

Glen




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120210141945.GA1848>