From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 07:04:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8A816A40F for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eazybsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web57915.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57915.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFDE243D6E for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:04:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eazybsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 85057 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2006 07:04:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KKlGVIGX+wSjJzlLvH2MVqZlYTUOgDewi/qbJ/9t/5Yn75N60+XCQniNTicrBXyfHHRD5FpRR1E0sly+sHF6dB7623qKPY2l2Cxd23EXAk1cjXZeM2Ifxopq93r8FaRhCPMEBH5ilyYAV7T4GDv/TMuty+1kXAc3X+U6OTNW1Yg= ; Message-ID: <20061027070408.85055.qmail@web57915.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.189.183.98] by web57915.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:04:07 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:04:07 -0700 (PDT) From: eazy bsd To: Jeremy Chadwick In-Reply-To: <20061027031051.GA25398@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:07:06 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup11.freebsd.org dns issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:04:16 -0000 >> the two authxx ones below do not seem to be carrying its >> records either. > Is this issue at all related to the recent discussion of > ... > registrar) due to a DDoS being distributed across numerous reachability is separate from records being present, so it's unlikely. though if the records in question are being served up via caching/forwarding servers or something's pooched in the propagation paths, sure, bizarre looking things could crop up. i've seen 3rd level domains go south for days because their parent 2ld 'went away' and didn't have the glue to get to them when they reappeared. > See NANOG mailing list archives for details; thread is titled with nanog all things are possible. i'll leave that non-freebsd thread there and end this one here ;-] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com