From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 14:29:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03611 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:29:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03572 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 21:28:55 GMT (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA02798; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:28:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:28:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199804222128.RAA02798@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: Garrett Wollman , Poul-Henning Kamp , Harlan Stenn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6353 In-Reply-To: References: <199804221423.KAA01392@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> Strongly disagree. Every NFS system out there comes with an >> automounter of some sort or another. Most of them come with Sun's >> broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable. >> amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and >> one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in >> our kernel code). > It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed > from eachother. I don't see what the problem is. The point is: it doesn't belong in *ports*. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message