From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Apr 13 2:11:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B57737B5DB; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:11:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id CAA69915; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:11:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:11:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Bush Doctor Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A question on port building? In-Reply-To: <20000412133914.B87373@goku.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote: > This question arises from something I noticed when trying to > build codecrusader. (Thanxs to Kent) It seems that codecrusader > depends on bison during its build process. Now that bison is part > of the system, is it sufficient to have "USE_BISON=yes" in the > Makefile? I'm asking because I see from bsd.port.mk Bison was ripped back out of the base system in 4.0. Hence USE_BISON :-) Most ports don't need it. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message