From owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 11:04:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A8516A4B3; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE78943FBF; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from kallisti.ca ([207.81.23.108]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.netSMTP <20030919180421.PPEM6747.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@kallisti.ca>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:04:21 -0600 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:06:38 -0700 From: Chris Pressey To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Message-Id: <20030919110638.5c282e06.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: References: <20030918152942.5c7163df.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <3F6A2A72.90405@tenebras.com> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org cc: kudzu@tenebras.com cc: FreeBSD-qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8). X-BeenThere: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Quality Assurance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:04:22 -0000 On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:45:43 +0200 des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > Michael Sierchio writes: > > What legal issues? It seems entirely possible to produce a > > license-compliant var-qmail package for FreeBSD. It would be nice > > to offer it as the default MTA. >=20 > No, because QMail needs patches to run correctly on FreeBSD (in fact, > it requires patches to run correctly on *any* system, because DJB > doesn't want to lose face by admitting that QMail contains bugs, and > therefore hasn't updated the official distribution since mid-1998). Could you elaborate on that? Unless I'm mistaken, the only patches in /usr/ports/qmail/files are patches needed for qmail to *install* correctly - and all the WITH_*_PATCH options refer to optional patches. If I'm missing a patch for correct behaviour I'd like to get my mitts on it ASAP :) -Chris