Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:48:48 +0300
From:      JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil
To:        stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        bsilver@chrononomicon.com
Subject:   RE: feasible w/ samba?
Message-ID:  <CE2BFBAA80DD874BB737A4E2C53AA44903B01926@CG69UBD01>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> -----Original Message-----
> From: stheg olloydson [mailto:stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:38 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: bsilver@chrononomicon.com
> Subject: Re: feasible w/ samba?
> 
> 
> it was said:
> 
> >What this would essentially be attempting to achieve is to 
> have a way 
> >for a geographically spread out network allow people to 
> easily access 
> >their home directories and shares no matter where they logged using 
> >local servers acting as time-delayed proxies...all the user login 
> >information, user home directory data, user shared data 
> >directories...it's a lot of duplicated information out there, but it 
> >would fix the problem with authentication and home directory 
> >information being temporarily inaccessible when a link is 
> down between
> 
> >building locations.  No matter what building they were in, 
> they would 
> >have access to that building's copy of their home directory; 
> the next 
> >day, logging into a different building, they'd get their information 
> >again.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> What you have here is a hardware, not software, problem. The 
> root cause
> is the unreliable connectivity between buildings. To ensure 
> all network
> resources are always available, use redundant fiber-optic connections
> and set your routing such that you can reach buildingX from buildingY
> via buildingZ, as well as directly.
> Then you can (although it may be heresy on this list) avoid 
> using FBSD.
> Your simplest solution is to use Windows built-in Roaming 
> Profiles. The
> feature exists to accomplish the exact task of making the user's
> resources (including desktop config) available on the login
> workstation. 
> Doing things this way has to benefits your proposed solution does not.
> First, you guarantee all net segments are reachable at all 
> times, which
> is the root of your problem. This solves that problem and prevents
> future ones being caused by this. Second, admin is greatly simplified.
> Your way requires too many bits that need looking after. The long-term
> cost of this solution will be greater than running the fiber.
> Finally, you should look into Kerberos for a single sign-on solution.
> Windows and AD both support it.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Stheg
> 

Samba has support for roaming profiles and works quite well. Also,
integration 
with ldap and kerberos is pretty well documented and allows for a single
point 
of authentication. Not quite a full blown Active Directory solution, but
would 
more than accomplish all that is wanted.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CE2BFBAA80DD874BB737A4E2C53AA44903B01926>