From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 13:43:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F5216A41F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:43:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lerik@nolink.net) Received: from electra.nolink.net (electra.nolink.net [195.139.204.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DD043D62 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:43:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lerik@nolink.net) Received: (qmail 92538 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Dec 2005 13:43:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 13:43:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:43:08 +0100 (CET) From: Lars Erik Gullerud To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20051214020913.GA64113@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20051214144102.Q63851@electra.nolink.net> References: <000001c5fcaa$0988b040$04030201@misho> <439F3F1B.3050608@FreeBSD.org> <20051213220223.GA61287@xor.obsecurity.org> <2a41acea0512131632x23d068e2wb3d66c08e6741ac4@mail.gmail.com> <20051214020913.GA64113@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Doug Barton , Jack Vogel , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUG: ip_output.c FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:43:11 -0000 On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:32:10PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: >> On 12/13/05, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:37:31PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> Mihail Balikov wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> In FreeBSD 4.x in ip_output.c in part for ipfw local forwarding there's typo >>>>> that will cause kernel panic: >>>> >>>> If you haven't already, this should be filed as a problem report. >>> >>> I don't know that there's a lot of point since 4.11 is in "legacy" >>> mode and few developers still use it. >> >> The humorous thing is that althought I'm sure its true "few developers" >> still use it, in places where it has actual commercial use, they are still >> using 4.x in large numbers. >> >> So bottom line... there is value in bugs being noted and filed :) > > Sure, I guess..as long as there aren't unrealistic expectations about > someone fixing it. The original mail contained the patch that fixes the problem if I'm not mistaken, so I guess the only expectations here are that someone goes and commits it if the OP creates a PR with the patch... Which shouldn't really be too unrealistic, should it? /leg