From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 2 13:09:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE7EDFED02 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 13:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-cmomta01.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1D66F3B4 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 13:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from raspberrypi.bildanet.com ([65.186.81.207]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id L7MfeEVnLFUYqL7MieI622; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:57:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.143] (helo=desktop.example.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1eL7PP-0004Uh-Ir for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:00:43 +0000 Subject: Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1512211220.79413.1.camel@yandex.com> <7f654c63-dd5d-e54f-a8cf-ff1d18128d94@vishwin.info> From: Baho Utot Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 08:00:43 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7f654c63-dd5d-e54f-a8cf-ff1d18128d94@vishwin.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEcykMmDQ25zOPtxW5ADsZMs74vAsBlMyUsMMgXnb9HEPPuSDEprNSl8W4rOwwMOJwuF2ZJ9e6MD68Rz/xT4H/Zqwmhtb+X+IUJfPiJ/6ydV1JYGXeRh pJ7HFHI8HypzQaIfmO4ptQt7B5mHV9SBOx7ksv/gbnpo+vBCkhfHsbZEH47yWf50FNjKR7aURxdfPeY3qgS3BQYXj8i2ZG13qNc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:09:06 -0000 On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use >> an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home network. >> > poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features > that I don't exactly use, but it's certainly not industrial-sized. I had > the same impression of a monstrosity before I started using it myself, > on my *laptop* of all things. >> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", >> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has done a >> pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. Which brings me >> to what happens if I do embrace "poudriere". How long before that becomes >> history also? >> > portmgr officially maintains and promotes poudriere. It's not going > anywhere until they say it is. > Sorry tired of playing games, leaving FreeBSD as we speak