Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:37:43 +0200
From:      "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@mailbox.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports upgrade script
Message-ID:  <86k2jx62mg.wl-herbert@mailbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl>
References:  <2daca22c-7719-0776-fbe8-3c37021298bf@cloudzeeland.nl> <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de> <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
JosC  skrev:
> 
> In een bericht van 16-4-2016 12:24:
>> Use either portsnap (binary upgrade) or svn (source upgrade) to keep
>> your ports collection current. In your specific case, I'd probably
>> be a good idea to entirely remove /usr/ports (or rename it) and
>> start with a fresh copy, to be obtained by _one_ of the two methods.
> Thanks for your suggestion - what I don't understand is why my
> /user/src folder is emty.
> Is that normal using portsnap?

% man portsnap

--
Herbert



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k2jx62mg.wl-herbert>