From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:03:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13C01065670 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBFBA7.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.251.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q1Q03TrG094075; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:30 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1Q03Iaw080906; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q035OW083472; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Artifex Maximus From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:33:39 +0100." Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:05 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang vs gcc linking problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 -0000 Artifex Maximus wrote: > Hello! > > Absolutely not a flame war but would like to switch to clang in a > project. Project uses ncurses. gcc works well but the executable fails > when compiled other than -O0. Then I think I should change to clang > which will becomes the default compiler in FreeBSD. With clang at > linking time I got the following error: > > /usr/local/bin/ld: display/libsub_display.a(canvas.o): undefined > reference to symbol 'keypad' > /usr/local/bin/ld: note: 'keypad' is defined in DSO > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0 so try adding it to the linker command > line > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > *** Error code 1 > > With exactly the same flags gcc links successful. Any idea where is > the problem and what is the solution? > > Thanks, There have been quite a number of discussions on Gcc & Clang of various lists since efforts to transition started, I don't see a specific list here, http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo but this may interest http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:13:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650A106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76008FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326075C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:15 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6FB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 -0000 On 02/26/12 08:14, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:07:36 +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Polytropon wrote: >>> I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color >>> laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 >>> web-based configuration, none of the methods that are >>> supposed to be used for installing a printer works. >> (... snip ...) >> >>> What am I doing wrong? :-) >> Have you heeded *all* the advices here? >> /usr/ports/print/cups-base/pkg-message >> >> Permissions are usually the culprit when CUPS doesn't work. > Done (even with the variation of 0660 vs. 0770 as suggested > in that file): > > [system=10] > add path 'unlpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'ulpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'lpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb/4.2.*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb*' mode 0770 group cups > > Same result == no result. :-) I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any config would have to be based on that. Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in cups using lpd. JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 01:42:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1210106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D39B8FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBD003DD07C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 -0000 On 25/02/2012 22:14, Polytropon wrote: > I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color > laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 > web-based configuration, none of the methods that are > supposed to be used for installing a printer works. > > The "Add Printer" button leads to this: > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > Local Printers: > Discovered Network Printers: > Other Network Printers: o Internet Printing Protocol (http) > o Internet Printing Protocol (ipp) > o LPD/LPR Host or Printer > o AppSocket/HP JetDirect > [ Continue ] > > No local printers can be selected (even though the > printer is connected, switched on and woken up). > > > > And "Find New Printers" shows this: > > > > Available Printers > ------------------ > No printers found. > > > > Excellent auto detection. :-) > > > > The corresponding device for the printer is this: > > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on usbus4 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > > ugen4.2: > at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > crw-rw---- 1 root cups 0, 142 Feb 25 21:42 /dev/ulpt0 > > I have installed all packages I can imagine: > > cups-1.4.6 > cups-base-1.4.6_6 > cups-client-1.4.6 > cups-image-1.4.6 > cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_6 > gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > foomatic-db-20090530_2 > foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 > gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > > I also have the CLX-216xsplc.ppd PPD file available > which I think I'd like to hand over to CUPS somewhere. > > ALTERNATIVE: If someone could explain how it's easier > to make a lpr filter (for the system's printer service), > I'd also appreciate this. > > I've already tried this: > > # foo2xqx-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > It causes the LED of the printer to blink, but nothing is > printed, even though the printer startes to make sounds > (involving the print mechanism, but not the sheet feeder). > > If I use > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > the CUPS test page is printed, but not in color (only b/w). > After looking into the manpage, > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > makes the printer print properly. > > Okay, it works. > > How am I supposed to use a PPD file with CUPS when no > local printer is shown? > > I "need" CUPS (or at least my programs seem to think > that), how should it be done? > > Okay, I could make a simple printer filter. I could then > integrate that with /etc/printcap (as I do with my PCL > HP Laserjet 4000d). I think it should be possible to code > that similar to a parallel printer (with ulpt instead > of lpt device specification for the lp= parameter... > > What am I doing wrong? :-) You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. Since # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. (Yes triple / before dev) The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Normally one should work. Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was mainly for debug anyway). I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few HP and Canon. Tell us how it went. Jerome Herman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 04:09:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886C11065674 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D65F8FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q49Eo8030029; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:09:16 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:09:13 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: "C. P. Ghost" Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 03:26:48 C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2012 14:14:32 Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/02/2012 06:59, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> > I live in Asia and they really have these things here. Just without the horns. > >> > >> That would be what most people call a "ball." They have them in the > >> west too... > > > > do they vibrate when they get moved? > > Yes, but only if they run FreeBSD, and only if they have the > hw.balls.vibrating sysctl(8) set to 1. always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more exiting. We do not need sysctl. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 06:58:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA76106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252D8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPCq077595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPYT002349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1Q6wPxA002348; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: kpneal@pobox.com Message-ID: <20120226065824.GE59682@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mapping back gptid -> device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 26), kpneal@pobox.com said: > If I have this: > > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# ls -la /dev/gptid/ > total 1 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 . > dr-xr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 .. > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 118 Feb 1 12:44 7050cab7-4add-11e1-8919-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 122 Feb 1 12:44 d78fd637-4a40-11e1-ab9b-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 106 Feb 1 12:44 e1ec4071-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 112 Feb 1 12:44 f96b3a2c-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# > > How do I determine which of those /gptid/ entries corresponds to which > listed in kernel messages printed at boot. > > I have tried "gpart show -r", but it doesn't give the gptid of the entire > drive -- only the partitions: > > => 34 877920189 mfid0 GPT (419G) > 34 256 1 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f (128K) > 290 44041950 2 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (21G) > 44042240 817889280 3 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (390G) > 861931520 15988703 - free - (7.6G) Try "gpart list" instead, and look at the "rawuuid" field. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 07:20:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BD106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913018FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q7KbaS098343; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:14 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 -0000 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:22:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91892106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W54 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:10:16 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16.0060 (UTC) FILETIME=[12740BC0:01CCF45E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 -0000 When I start cd /usr/src make buildkernel KERNELCONF=3DMYKERNEL then the process start and gives -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------- Even though my config file has ident MYKERNEL I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy= from GENERIC) and it exists in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf I'm probably missing something really simple here=2C why would 'make' go fo= r GENERIC instead of my custom config? This is 9.0 RELEASE. Thanks=2C Caro = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:27:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E76E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80B88FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B065C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AFFB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F49EBD3.7070805@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:22:43 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 -0000 On 02/26/12 18:10, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. Try `make KERNCONF=MYKERNEL buildkernel` From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:26:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75842106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBDD8FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q9PrL0005428; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:26:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:25:51 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Carolyn Longfoot Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 15:10:16 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 I do not know where the word GENERIC is taken from. Maybe from you configuration file? > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > Ok, excluded then. > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 is what I do. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:41:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD67E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961988FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so6442995iae.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.155.202; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.155.202]) by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr11564514igb.8.1330249262171 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dx25eTof4D8UsQ0WaDqhOwj4nGfCrl81K2RYxNL+sSo=; b=x9aKr43LCtuDhNOwqCR/a4LwiClb9YEfx4w47dp/JO4bSFn6ccr90oR3BYWi40RjJY nITcSxYbek9JHBUPC7Ok67jcidcD+JLcrSBpEB+V0CZeh8NqU/tFaQ+8gO/S3lLOmYo+ int+2Cc16bUGwAhVKnrEaeTWz2Uz0uJKnXDpY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr9253923igb.8.1330247620115; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.85.133 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:43:40 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: kern/94369: [bktr] [patch] Patch to support Leadtek WinFast Tv2000 XP bktr card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 -0000 Hi. I have one of these cards. I notice the PR is open - does this mean the patch was not committed? Is there anything I can do to get eyeballs on this? I've never compiled from source or applied a diff but if it needs testng and someone's willing to give me a basic outline of the procedure I'll see if I can avago. Learning this stuff is on my todo list for this decade but time is short. Best wishes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 14:37:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA9C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6F8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W59 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:37:32 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: , Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: , <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CA28F90:01CCF494] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 -0000 > >=20 > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >=20 > is what I do. >=20 > Erich ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 16:05:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A20106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF30D8FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1QG50fv015387; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:05:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Carolyn Longfoot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:04:59 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202262304.59170.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 21:37:32 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 > > > > is what I do. > > > > Erich > > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... > this is what we are for. The simplest things are very often the most difficult to solve. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:46:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727A1106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FC38FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859953DB7F; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHkrWe002783; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerome Herman Message-Id: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working > printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. > Since > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. > So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose > HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you > have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. > (Yes triple / before dev) > The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. > If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and "usb://" isn't mentioned): Add Printer ----------- Connection: _________________________________ Examples: http://hostname:631/ipp/ http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 ipp://hostname/ipp/ ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 lpd://hostname/queue socket://hostname socket://hostname:9100 See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print [ Continue ] See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) > Normally one should work. Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't print anything. No action. > Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any > URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was > mainly for debug anyway). Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or not)? > I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few > HP and Canon. > Tell us how it went. I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no action on the printer. However, when I issue a command like this: % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps > /dev/ulpt0 pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) In the system log, I get those: ugen1.5: at usbus1 ulpt0: on usbus1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions, the /dev/u(n)lpt0 devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0761C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71398FC13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9343DD7B; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHpm5r002793; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I > understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer > will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any > config would have to be based on that. The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in > cups using lpd. Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the essential part). I just hope printing will be possible from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the primary candidates) afterwards. You know, many "modern" programs _expect_ CUPS to be present, some have hardcoded "calls" to CUPS programs, some seem to even _not_ output PS (which should be standard), but instead PCL or whatnot. > JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) Considered - yes, but I thought I would be able to avoid it and use the "modern" CUPS toolkit for something simple like printing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:41:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D43106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1268FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so659469yhg.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.197.98; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.197.98]) by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr14559355yhn.24.1330281660074 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr10841194yhn.24.1330281659989; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q55sm31620332yhi.0.2012.02.26.10.40.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Tww3Y3JQlz2CG4D for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120226134057.031b11b5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225165536.082b0b4e@scorpio> <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmO1Et5CJDAZnnUUvvuMmjjjwGaINI4YZ0axgIgdBdtRBI2vOAKrnfBOhkRM9PHy+bHZjin Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 -0000 On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:03:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > I _never_ would buy a USB printer, and I would also never > buy something that doesn't talk PS (or at least PCL). Both "PS" and to a lesser extent "PCL" are becoming passé. You might want to seriously consider "PDF". The better Brother printers fully support it as do some of the better printers from other manufacturers. You might want to check out for further details. The "PS" format is going to become considerably less important in a relatively short time in my estimation. By the way, have you considered a USB to Ethernet adapter? Totally untested with a printer, but it might work quite well. If it works, you could plug it into a wireless router and print from anywhere sans nasty cables, etcetera. I print wirelessly, and I love it. It "just works" and it makes my life simpler. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:50:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41ED106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD588FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1QIotAb010871; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1QIotd8010868; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I >> understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer >> will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any >> config would have to be based on that. > > The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > > > >> Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in >> cups using lpd. > > Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in > /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer > filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the > essential part). I just hope printing will be possible > from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the > primary candidates) afterwards. Opera, I have not tried. OpenOffice and LibreOffice print through lpd fine. Printing through Gutenprint in Gimp also works without CUPS. Something has a probably-unnecessary dependency on cups-client, so it's installed here, but none of the rest of CUPS. PS: using the non-resetting unlpt0 device is often helpful. A network connection is still better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:29:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEE41065688 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145308FC1A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A3EF3DD034; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:48 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 -0000 On 26/02/2012 18:46, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: >> You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working >> printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. >> Since >> >> # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx >> # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 >> >> works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. >> So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose >> HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you >> have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. >> (Yes triple / before dev) >> The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. >> If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 > Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS > "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things > should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. > > The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and > "usb://" isn't mentioned): > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > > Connection: _________________________________ > > Examples: > > http://hostname:631/ipp/ > http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 > > ipp://hostname/ipp/ > ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 > > lpd://hostname/queue > > socket://hostname > socket://hostname:9100 > > See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print > > [ Continue ] > > See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. > > > > It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before > driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you > bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. > > > >> Normally one should work. > Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, > it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) > It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. > > % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series > Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready > Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size > 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes > > This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't > print anything. No action. OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little complicated. > > > >> Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any >> URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was >> mainly for debug anyway). > Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what > you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is > correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or > not)? They did, then they got bought by Apple... > > > >> I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few >> HP and Canon. > > >> Tell us how it went. > I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection > and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size > 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no > action on the printer. > > However, when I issue a command like this: > > % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps> /dev/ulpt0 > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > > The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's > stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" > different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) > > In the system log, I get those: > > ugen1.5: at usbus1 > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 5> on usbus1 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > > Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play > with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing > can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions > should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now > are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions > , the /dev/u(n)lpt0 > devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. > > Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools > that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected > elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. I for one do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default package/port is not a good idea at all) You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:41:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F359106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C5148FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29820 invoked by uid 0); 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2012 21:41:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=1u8NWinlFvst+STZgl/WoEOInyw6B0ZSvS++yaTt/NI=; b=h3KuKLmPShm2s7q5JeNUozlzdY/Grq1sn0trWirlUVvWhwT/mbRt04xWHWhVA6UUfes2sS8nkMqz42D+BS/hHmLplqEzCDoTT4X89ipfq8Q++GUyAnIIO8OYcEHDEB3F; Received: from [70.98.65.183] (helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S1lqf-0001io-Er for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:41 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:35 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120226214135.GA14375@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 70.98.65.183 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:09:13AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more > exiting. > > We do not need sysctl. I guess that depends on your definition of sysctl, and I rather like it. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 22:20:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19836106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D368FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so746398wib.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.78.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.78.6]) by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr13072229wiw.18.1330294827560 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr10339079wiw.18.1330294827513; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb10sm45397861wib.10.2012.02.26.14.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:26 -0800 (PST) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:19:40 +0100 To: Carolyn Longfoot X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmEB7ok+mWjfR7bkW964kz1tJoSKviBR/BFOCKTPzaC7LWn/6wSEONLekjcHNpi0S//APxH Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 -0000 On 26 Feb 2012, at 15:37, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >>=20 >> is what I do. >>=20 >> Erich >=20 > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... >=20 Pro tip, put it in your /etc/make.conf like so: KERNCONF=3DWHATEVERYOUSAID Then cd /usr/src && make buildkernel You might also want to have a look at MODULES_OVERRIDE, also to be put in ma= ke.conf , saves a huge lot of time.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 01:16:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3878A1065677 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F48FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Tx4qT6BSSz1SJ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:16:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:14:43 -0500 From: Daniel Staal To: Bernt Hansson , "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> References: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 -0000 --As of February 26, 2012 8:20:14 AM +0100, Bernt Hansson is alleged to have said: > http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html > > Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and > ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 > > What does it say? Can you connect? > > There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem > > You can look at your routing table with netstat -r --As for the rest, it is mine. This is my strong suspicion as well. To separate out what the problem is: 'su' to root in the jailed system. Shut down postfix. (`postfix stop`, or `/etc/rc.d/postfix stop`) Then run `nc -l 25`. This will echo anything that comes in on port 25 direct to your terminal. Then try telneting to it. If it works, the problem is postfix. If it doesn't, restart postfix and ignore it: It's not the problem. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 09:26:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A931065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronnyma@volatile.no) Received: from na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A1D48FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob105.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT0tMXXhG+NlMZi73m8RkaGx+wqoLt+Z0@postini.com; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:55 PST Received: by mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com with SMTP id x4so5421914obh.20 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.20.9; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ronnyma@volatile.no; dkim=pass header.i=ronnyma@volatile.no Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.20.9]) by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr5532646oee.6.1330334813344 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=volatile.no; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TOnkdgszTlwDkbs9POG7kqWsF1YGlLucg6h2+7jhhdk=; b=ZwFu5oMz/YMgHuUE7eq+AiulDdXlfxDO+VNv3QoCsVQxXZe285kqXb0ebqOv9yDlpU L62b8kmV74tImtAO3iXcjZMzRBaC8zTqKeWBXEbhtaIhq8C1AtYU80Qt54vrfl9MgdVx k574yxZrIj4jpZE3BRtJfyBKqYO7zLy3xnyaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr4849709oee.6.1330334813183; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.20.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:26:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Ronny Mandal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmVcaE9PaguXJGgiexAJJ6hIGc3yVxNPV8yXbvOoGgp8mTRAyegYkx+UmrYFu6uGYBhgU3 Subject: Re: 9.0, Samba and two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 -0000 On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share >> is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the >> computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD >> and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the >> new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD >> and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is >> utilizing the wireless card. >> >> My smb.conf looks something like this: >> >> .. >> ;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0 >> interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 >> bind interfaces only = yes >> ; the two latter is the IPs of the W7 >> hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1 >> >> >> If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb. >> >> netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces. >> >> What might be wrong? > > What address is the w7 using? > > If it is using 192.X, that could be the problem. That or some variation... > such as the w7 using wireless and 192.x? Sorry about the late answer and missing info. The W7 is using both, i.e. wireless and wired. Strangely enough, it works now. Here is what I did: The interface parameter; I put the 10.* before the 192.* and stopped and started the samba-service. After that, the wired card were utilized when I copied to and from the share. interfaces = 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 127.0.0.1 changed to interfaces = 10.0.0.2 192.168.0.232 127.0.0.1 (I tried this earlier, but it seems that /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba restart did not properly re-read the configuration.) Regards, Ronny Mandal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 13:49:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD19106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk.sbor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA4D8FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1026611ggn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.72.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dmk.sbor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dmk.sbor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.72.170]) by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr21353819yhd.101.1330350595060 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qwDbbc8fRksUurHBg9m2nK6NAjeR6efMjSD4INUmx/E=; b=PxkENXmD1Hoo4kpTSqOLoUcz2vd7gYTjKbQT7/ZpEH6I07k1trRK5/35Sxksy1AGJv o3hfOMql80ClJ2+4L1JJYAono4NU/ANpEAh7OFcETzIaBTOsqe14db37oyhRkCSDLBiq g3wGKjUImWbKmfuS2skMyREbIgaK+GEpyDHKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr15766837yhd.101.1330348967398; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.204.2 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:22:47 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Dmitry S. Kasterin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Recurring "rescan already queued" message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:56 -0000 Hello! I am trying to install 9.0-RELEASE from standard amd64 memstick image. During the install huge amount of "rescan already queued" messages breaks installer interface. (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued So, I have 2 questions: 1) Are these messages harmless? 2) Messages are a little bit annoying. So, is there any way to suppress them? Some remarks: 1) I am trying to install FreeBSD on HP ProBook 4730s, which seems to be affected by a recent Intel bug: http://ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/intel-6x-chipset-bug-p1.html 2) HDD is ada0 on ata0. 3) The messages are genetared constantly: # dmesg | grep "rescan already queued" | wc -l 98 # uptime ... 14 mins ... 4) I've tried to suppress messages by setting "hint.ata.1.disabled=1", but this had no effect (may be due to my mistake?) 5) Verbose kernel log has the following part: (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued ata1: DISCONNECT requested 6) vmstat -i gives the following: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 653 4 irq9: acpi0 417 2 irq14: ata0 164 1 irq16: ehci0 ehci1 12335 81 cpu0:timer 75201 498 irq256: hdac0 12 0 cpu1:timer 92952 615 cpu2:timer 74159 491 cpu3:timer 97503 645 Total 353396 2340 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 14:46:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F12106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Arindam.Misra@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B678FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,490,1325491200"; d="scan'208,217";a="628844441" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q1REIEpO002569 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.6.92]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:27 -0800 From: "Misra, Arindam" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: NTP Autokey configuration Thread-Index: Acz1Wp4l1w3q9dxxQye9kmkELOdmrw== Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.53] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 -0000 Hi, I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one = of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact c= onfiguration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protoco= l working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which work= s for a scenario described above. Arindam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:20:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADD1065678 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09D8FC1C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.86] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1RFK6WP082589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:08 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4F4B9F26.7060407@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:06 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Misra, Arindam" References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 -0000 On 27/02/2012 14:18, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam i presume you've tried: http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/ConfiguringAutokey#Section_6.7.2.2. (you'll likely need to use 'freeBSD' paths for /etc/ i.e /usr/local/etc/ if installed from ports). I particulalrly liked *6.7.1 (How to use this guide*) 1. Perform the server set-up before performing the client set-up 2. Follow each step in this guide > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546< Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE33A106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D64F8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.209] by nm22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.57] by tm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1330356425; bh=3ibngkbZPWDXakDlUWdXgNAqIQlyq/E/zC7csRoCE9o=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Return-Path:Received-SPF:Authentication-Results:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=hIUpXLpxR/5if0GAxhzBQWxNYpFa1Eu212qXPVD2R09HjZjq0BsczNkuTEbwQHz5xUOOHNXjj1eQeQ92UFtOEV71wWWNgjqMPUcr/P8xnzQJe6us3nLvBygbJEr3wSgGCHPZyhoCJdE3xmjHZRIXEn76gHQeIaEnSoNb/VidoRM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 120078.68089.bm@smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 7B_HmxcVM1n.MbpKv0wX5I9QWe1OEmuPpXvw13hG5M94kxE tQ3qjvUjK1s2bL2yHSmGjm5NlKsuh4B1DqKipj7BQeMLtvSwJL6Rb6.ZXtXS LDD16AHH0E78w0tvtZLSwv8IlIBZkQOFJk.s2ZUgjP_rggEv9bMJF_6cLpeD 8Bbh_MnpVwh24u7alRetWfNlzKJ2T48.4QYuRhPw6ACN5TAUnptWwwMg0B5q MKAn64N3Ui6MqmR3t9k7p1l0bQEAqHU8seuZ17Ml4UX_f5Iwk202ftDzcfWv A5K1jjkaWGQBsBX6cYB022jWz3JXmm6zQb6cAC_MSk9CEm0Yt2KalNFQ5U7v ZXuxmw4hGf7RQI.IMJ2Q8jzyM2Wn4CKMX1F8HDw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.210.182 with plain) by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:04 +0000 GMT Received: by iaae16 with SMTP id e16so560994iaa.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.161.73; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=axelbsd@ymail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.161.73]) by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr14323268icx.16.1330356423730 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr11522410icx.16.1330356034903; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.147.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> From: Alexandre Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:14 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Misra, Arindam" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 -0000 Hi, A good start is the manpage of ntp.conf http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntp.conf&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports&arch=default&format=html The authentification support is described. You have the handbook page for the basics : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-ntp.html Regards, Alexandre On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one > of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact > configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey > protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file > which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:12:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C7E106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE448FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id CDA86180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B6C180DE2; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BED18B18E88; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FF5CA34002D4D0FF5CB81 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:26 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBExO3A References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51377) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 -0000 Hello Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail.=20 I am uncertain about flushing the states or machining some of the=20 TIMEWAITING constraints go away. Which is really blocking my email. Can anyone assist? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:20:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F271065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36658FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0BB59180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:00 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A14AD180DD7; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBE85B18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FFD8D92002D4D0FFD8EDF Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBFHqDA References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51390) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 -0000 Does anybody have an idea on how to clear the bruteforCE TABLE ON PFCTL ? An adaptive fw or pftcl device is blocking some of my email? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:39:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5FA1065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600748FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571382; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:39:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571380; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000301060109020809020706" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:13 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000301060109020809020706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far= apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms000301060109020809020706-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:45:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45704106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092EC8FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id EDCEF180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BAC74180D7E; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E74EDB18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1014126B002D4D101413B8 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1bl2zv6wT9KJhRJ2mRT7nxHRm5QAAFWWQ References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51431) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 -0000 Yes after a few minutes the email in question begins to flow. AT some point in the past some of the postfix boxes behind the firewall Where turned off. This caused the fw, I believe to think it was being Attacked because it had nowhere to push the smtp traffic. I believe that is why on several IPs I see TIME_WAITING for the connections. I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked with pf so=20 I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the=20 Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive behavior away or Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the firewall? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jon Radel [mailto:jon@radel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:39 AM To: Bender, Chris; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:54:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98B5106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sclists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607348FC1F for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1077564vbm.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.157.83; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sclists@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sclists@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.157.83]) by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr9746166vcx.54.1330361655714 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cPgc7GyBkEQal7RC1MYSqW16KhT+r8cZb3ktYM6lD9Y=; b=mOgK+oZz6DbNqN/XXsMC73ry3JDMBGNBsRQTfUj8kpwf9mxE/DYsL5TU0EzQC4b/zT bw+vZB9gnnlmSukNXWl+z10/QYF3bOVkc9LRRdvOM05giIFEH/BfNhC95Y9gGuRt6WGX 3ToYyfIWqXgP6xHCQgEipveSUVzV9Gkbn3620= Received: by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr7860525vcx.54.1330361655675; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ool-182c6755.dyn.optonline.net. [24.44.103.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ie6sm11359648vdb.5.2012.02.27.08.54.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:54:17 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 -0000 Hello all! I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). Here's the list of things I need to change on each new clone, am I missing anything obvious? Or are there any gotchas to what I'm trying? 1) I have to change the hostname in rc.conf 2) I have to change the IP address in rc.conf (I'm using static IPs) 2a) I saw (on the internet) some people having problems because VirtualBox generates a new MAC address for cloned "machines", which somehow screws up the naming of the network interfaces (e.g. they get renumbered, thereby ignoring any configuration you have set up). Now I can't find it anymore, at least not for FreeBSD. Some Linux forums have info about "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" which doesn't exist in FreeBSD as far as I can tell. Is this a concern? I don't seem to be having a problem but TBH I'd rather understand what is going on than just be lucky. 3) Create new SSH keys 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and reboot, is there a better way? 3b) Should I bother changing the SSH keys for any users I have? It is basically one user (I use to log in with) which will be the same across the board anyway. Thanks for any insight! -- Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:58:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C83C1065679 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EA28FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571415; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571413; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:02 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080506060205070603050200" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080506060205070603050200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/27/12 11:45 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked= > with pf so > I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the= > Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Any pf.conf file I've ever seen does something sensible after reload.=20 I suspect one could write something perverse that blows up on restart,=20 but that would making rebooting the machine problematic.... > > Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive > behavior away or > Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the > firewall? pf can load data from files when it starts or just manage things in a=20 fashion that is transient upon restart. Hard to say what's happening in = your case w/o a clue as to what's in pf.conf. I'd suggest that you at the very least whitelist internal SMTP speakers=20 that you expect to get e-mail from on a regular basis, even if you do=20 throttling of SMTP connections in general. Much less messy.... --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms080506060205070603050200-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:00:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08F106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E8B8FC18 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9E8A5180DCA; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:48 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 651C5180D25; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 922ACB1885D; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1021FDB3002D4D1021FF00 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:43 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1cP1DAMqrc42YSSCbJ5xM8yHO1gAACQng References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51455) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-U