From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 19 13:26:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 825641CB
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 13:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from quix.smartspb.net (quix.smartspb.net [217.119.16.133])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A60F2B98
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 13:26:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dyr.smartspb.net ([217.119.16.26] helo=[127.0.0.1])
 by quix.smartspb.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
 (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dyr@smartspb.net>)
 id 1WmNdj-000N7g-Ns
 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 May 2014 17:30:03 +0400
Message-ID: <537A0687.3050501@smartspb.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:26:31 +0400
From: Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [Was]: Problem with ipfw table add 0.0.0.0/8
References: <5371084F.1060009@bsdinfo.com.br>	<F78BF3AC-F031-4528-A4C1-5B22E88CEC00@dataix.net>	<5371112B.2030209@bsdinfo.com.br>	<5371E9E7.70400@smartspb.net>	<5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org>	<53720AA4.80909@smartspb.net>	<537767C5.80205@FreeBSD.org>	<53783333.3010205@freebsd.org>	<F061517D-0A79-4734-A032-1F2BE060C8F6@dataix.net>
 <CAC+JH2xDM2u97Oa1YsG78x_6xdzTpBS-QD-cSfaWSKkKBU8GDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5379C6B6.4030105@smartspb.net> <537A00AC.6050305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <537A00AC.6050305@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140519-0, 19.05.2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 13:26:36 -0000

Longest prefix match, obviously. Doesn't see any reason to search for
exact match in case of existing prefix with that ip.

19.05.2014 17:01, Alexander V. Chernikov пишет:
> On 19.05.2014 12:54, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
>> Alex, Bill, it's a good news, glad to hear it.
>>
>> Let me ask even more functionality:
>>
>> 6. Test if entry exist in table:
>> ipfw table <id> test <item>
>> It extremely useful in case of big, unordered data in the table - for
>> example different networks with different mask. Now it's almost
>> impossible to find out is checked IP occurs in the table or not.
> Longest prefix match or exact match?
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Dennis Yusupoff,
network engineer of
Smart-Telecom ISP
Russia, Saint-Petersburg