From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 02:26:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B9F1065672 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6928FC08 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0P2Pu9a001542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0P2PuaC001541; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA13385; Sat, 24 Jan 09 17:43:43 PST Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:45:26 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Message-Id: <497bc436.fNXOAyK1W2GhLkwf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <3.0.1.32.20090123081931.00ed6460@sage-american.com> <20090123170132.M38136@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1232756388.2027.10.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20090124114057.X40562@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090124114057.X40562@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Registry corrupt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:26:21 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> describe something more. > >> and what you mean "rehash"? > > > > Rehashing forces the shell to "reinitialise" (for want of a > > better term) so that it rechecks the path and can sometimes > > discover new programs installed if they don't seem to work ... > > ok you mean shell rehashing. so PATH is missing something Or an executable was added to one of the PATH directories since the last time PATH was set or the "rehash" command was issued, e.g. when a port was installed or upgraded. See tcsh(1) for details.