Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:25:25 +0100 From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@wanadoo.fr> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of netns Message-ID: <200303042025.25227.vjardin@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030305004730.A13129@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20030305004730.A13129@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why does it need to be removed ? According to me, it would be the same mi= stake=20 as the removal of netiso and netccitt. I did not know FreeBSD at this tim= e,=20 but nowadays, in order to get an OS that supports many stacks, we have to= use=20 NetBSD. BSD4.4 was designed in order to support many stacks, FreeBSD 6, 7 ou 9 wi= ll=20 support only IPv4 and IPv6, won't they ? I do not think that it needs to be removed. One should try to keep this=20 feature. Regards, Vincent Le Mardi 4 Mars 2003 14:47, Tim Robbins a =E9crit : > Is there a compelling reason why I shouldn't remove netns? That is, doe= s > it serve a purpose now that it could not serve if it was moved to the > Attic? > > > Tim > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303042025.25227.vjardin>