Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:10:05 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jburkholder0829@home.com> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: Manfred Antar <null@pozo.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current SMP Kernel panics Message-ID: <20010210171005.BECB0BAB0@cr66388-a.rchrd1.on.wave.home.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> of "Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:20:34 %2B0100." <20010210162033.C406@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Should it become: > > #ifdef SMP > mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); > need_resched(); > forward_roundrobin(); > mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock); > #else > > ? > > I cannot test it yet, need to reanimate my testbox first. You need to handle the UP case as well :) Also, I don't think that sched_lock should be held across forward_roundrobin(). But, my box still hangs with the assertion satisifed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010210171005.BECB0BAB0>