Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:52:29 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aspell conflicts with ispell? Message-ID: <CAN6yY1sDFRewKeTTdLejzXaFfCuaBGxTFV39YjXQv7-MvJHk-w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201209280117.AA00092@h115.65.228.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net> References: <1156205530.9964665.1348688310662.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <201209280117.AA00092@h115.65.228.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: > I think aspell does not conflict with ispell; they have no common files. > Is it any problem with ispell when running or building aspell ? > > BTW, textproc/ispell does not have "CONFLICTS" entry... it is confusing. I suspect it is bogus unless the Install the ispell wrapper is selected. If so, it installs it's own /usr/local/bin/ispell, a definite conflict. I don't know how good the ispell emulation is, but it MIGHT replace the separate ispell port. In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1sDFRewKeTTdLejzXaFfCuaBGxTFV39YjXQv7-MvJHk-w>