Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:18:50 +0400
From:      "Pavel Baleshenko" <pavlik@mcc.elektra.ru>
To:        <scuba@centroin.com.br>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ls -l taking too much time
Message-ID:  <01e701c5b2b3$4135eb70$e4f111ac@pavlik>
References:  <Pine.BSI.4.33.0509051648190.3371-100000@hypselo.centroin.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. I've the same problem on 5.3.
I think the problem occurs while file is being stat and passwd (uid to
name). Each file in /var/mail has its own owner. Try `ktrace ls -l` and look
the size of final dump file. May be its solution is in the tuning of the PAM
authorization.

> Hi all,
>
> Itīs a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE, on a P-IV(2.4GHz) with 120G IDE HDD
> (UFS2+softupdates), as one data partition (mail).
> The test was done in a non-production server.
> GENERIC kernel.
>
> A "ls -l" in a /var/mail folder with +6000 files (not maildir) is
> taking more then 2 min to complete.
> I compiled (static) "ls" from the GNU filetools-4.1 and it takes
> ~1 min.
> Observing the final behavior I can say that gnu has an
> "unbuffered" output, while fbsds is buffered.
> It was tested in two different machines.
> Is it right?
>
> - Marcelo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01e701c5b2b3$4135eb70$e4f111ac>