From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 18 14: 8:50 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7304337B405; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id g1IM8dD88331; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:08:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:08:38 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/procfs procfs_subr.c In-Reply-To: <200202182128.g1ILS4k97619@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My interpretation of this commit is that it's actually more cosmetic than concrete: i.e., the permission bits will look different, but the access control is the same. Is that right? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > des 2002/02/18 13:28:04 PST > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > sys/miscfs/procfs procfs_subr.c > Log: > Don't allow group to read process memory. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.26.2.3 +2 -3 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_subr.c > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message