From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:00:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE1F1065676 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD1E8FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0E70rK3006334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:00:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0E70qUa006333; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02343; Tue, 13 Jan 09 22:50:48 PST Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:52:52 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: GhostSniper007@hotmail.com Message-Id: <496d8bc4.y2sAEtGoaGQ1QLWh%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS fstab style X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:54 -0000 > Can someone confirm that these two lines are the same > -or- if one is preferred over the other ? > > Code: > 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,-b,-i 0 0 > 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,bg,intr 0 0 I've never seen the style of line 1 before, no idea whether it would work or not.