Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:28:40 +0100
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
Cc:        Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD doesn't have a Gnome3 port?
Message-ID:  <20131206132840.ab266f16.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjkwgfXqkDM2LRet3fhjxZWFraA-YYRxpp=reyOFYSAtbw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1386221592.4385.16.camel@debian> <CAKoxK+61HZPLR_xM7BC12dHc3y4eHPDCEvsRC8oQ_Jm1wUovnQ@mail.gmail.com> <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian> <CAKoxK+6=CdtntMJ-MRe9AqmmRcHM3EN_5HqUOYHEA1NvFRmcjw@mail.gmail.com> <1386328855.3871.38.camel@debian> <CAFYkXjkwgfXqkDM2LRet3fhjxZWFraA-YYRxpp=reyOFYSAtbw@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:35:00 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:20 PM, iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com> wrote:
> > agree? The users can decide their machines run like desktops or servers.
> > By default, most distributions have a default DE after installation or
> > on their live images. I think they should be regarded as
> > desktop-oriented. On the other hand, it's O.K. to call FreeBSD
> > server-oriented, right?
> 
> I use FreeBSD on my desktops and servers with no problem for maaany
> years :-)

I'm also using FreeBSD exclusively (!) on my desktop since
version 4.0 without any problems. I could do what the "cool
kids" could do before them, and even after they weren't able
to do it anymore. If "FreeBSD is server-oriented", that would
not have been possible. :-)

I agree that FreeBSD is an _excellent_ operating system for
servers, but it's not "for servers only". However, there are
desktop environments and applications that can be a trouble
to use, which primarily is because they aren't being developed
for FreeBSD, and they are not portable enough to allow porting
them as a "simple act". Still many software have arrived in
FreeBSD from Linux, and even from Solaris, because their design
did allow this. If a developer makes a decision of relying on
a different design, something that is not available outside of
a specific scope (in recent Gnome's case: Linux), and if this
is the _intended_ move of the developers - it's _their_ choice.



> Get the Xfce4 or KDE and it will be fine :-)

PC-BSD is a good illustration for that concept: Preinstalled
and preconfigured desktop environment on top, FreeBSD at the
heart, still versatile and changeable.

There are many ways to create a FreeBSD desktop. Maybe it's 
valid to say "There is no Gnome 3 desktop on FreeBSD" in the
future, but that does not make FreeBSD more "server-oriented"
or less "desktop-oriented".




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131206132840.ab266f16.freebsd>