Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:50 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Was]: Problem with ipfw table add 0.0.0.0/8 Message-ID: <537B91C2.7000609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <537A0967.1000808@smartspb.net> References: <5371084F.1060009@bsdinfo.com.br> <F78BF3AC-F031-4528-A4C1-5B22E88CEC00@dataix.net> <5371112B.2030209@bsdinfo.com.br> <5371E9E7.70400@smartspb.net> <5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org> <53720AA4.80909@smartspb.net> <537767C5.80205@FreeBSD.org> <53783333.3010205@freebsd.org> <F061517D-0A79-4734-A032-1F2BE060C8F6@dataix.net> <CAC%2BJH2xDM2u97Oa1YsG78x_6xdzTpBS-QD-cSfaWSKkKBU8GDg@mail.gmail.com> <5379C6B6.4030105@smartspb.net> <537A00AC.6050305@FreeBSD.org> <537A0560.2070902@gmail.com> <537A0967.1000808@smartspb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19.05.2014 17:38, Dennis Yusupoff wrote: > It's not enough, actually. > Imagine what you have a table with different networks. If you'll try to > find out is an IP belongs to some of that networks from the table, you > should to write relatively serious "wrapper" with network range > calculations in it. Or can you show differ (easier) way? > So it's REALLY usefull to implement that functions "out-of-the-box". Doing "test" function is quite easy. I'll probably do this after finishing new tables code merge. > I'm risking to be annoying, but there is a good (from customers point of > view) example of tables manipulation in Linux: ipset project > (http://ipset.netfilter.org/ipset.man.html) > > 19.05.2014 17:21, bycn82 пишет: >> It will be nice to have this feature, >> but since the `ipfw table <id> list` is existing, >> so I think this can be implemented outside the ipfw. >> (personal opinion only ) >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537B91C2.7000609>