From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 20:56:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011AC16A41C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:56:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smartweb@leadhill.net) Received: from natco3.natcotech.com (natco3.natcotech.com [205.167.142.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B199F43D5E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smartweb@leadhill.net) Received: from ibm.nlcc.us (ldhl-ras1-dial-12-28-24-182.natcotech.com [12.28.24.182]) by natco3.natcotech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343BB62DBB for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:56:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 72485 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2005 20:56:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (billy@192.168.0.2) by ibm.nlcc.us with SMTP; 15 Jun 2005 20:56:20 -0000 Message-ID: <42B095F4.1050100@leadhill.net> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:56:20 -0500 From: Billy Newsom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <42B06C2E.9030704@wadham.ox.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <42B06C2E.9030704@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 SMP kernels now available via FreeBSD Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:56:23 -0000 Colin Percival wrote: > It sounds like the SMP kernel I provided for FreeBSD 5.3 was quite > popular, so I've started building an SMP kernel for FreeBSD 5.4 as > well, in addition to the usual GENERIC kernel. To take advantage I'm curious how popular. Would you like to report some statistics here on the list? As in, how many SMP downloads did you get, say, in comparison to the GENERIC? I wonder just how popular SMP has become. I ran dual Pentium 120s on a 430HX motherboard once a long time ago. And I know SMP goes farther back to at least the Pentium 60. Back then, it was pretty unusual, but I wonder what it's like now. Thanks. BTW, nice idea you've got. I tried to use it back before you offered SMP kernels and was disappointed.