Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:01:11 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Ding=E9?= <raphael.dinge@ohmforce.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X over ethernet is too much slow... Message-ID: <20021217003111.GB15733@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <EDD43A65-1095-11D7-961E-00039312D14E@ohmforce.com> References: <20021215225946.GH97271@wantadilla.lemis.com> <EDD43A65-1095-11D7-961E-00039312D14E@ohmforce.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, 16 December 2002 at 2:30:15 +0100, Raphal Ding wrote: >> One common problem is when your NIC is set to half-duplex operation >> and everything else is set to full duplex. > > I've done an ifconfig as mentioned in the handbook, and it says > that my card (rl0) : > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > and of course it is active. I check on the PC running Windows, and > they are also configured in full duplex. > > So it does not seems to be that. (Well at least it seems) What does your switch say? I have a (NetBSD) box here which, for some reason, refuses to go into full duplex mode, though it claims it is in full duplex. > By the way I've set net.inet.tcp.sendspace to 65536, should I reboot > to make change takes effect ? No, why should you? > (it is not mentioned in man sysctl, this might be obvious but I > don't know) If you reboot, you'll reset the sysctls unless you also put them in /etc/sysctl.conf. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021217003111.GB15733>