Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:28:15 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk>
To:        Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com>
Cc:        Putinas Piliponis <putinas.piliponis@icnspot.net>
Subject:   Re: system lockup - ata spurious interrupts - somehow updated
Message-ID:  <405FD8FF.2070703@DeepCore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200403230053.i2N0rQsg069996@ambrisko.com>
References:  <200403230053.i2N0rQsg069996@ambrisko.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Soren Schmidt writes:
> | That said, the ICH5 support is written "blindfolded" as I do not have
> | any such HW here in the lab. So if there is a problem with ATA on those,
> | someone with the HW and enough kernel clue should look into it (or
> | someone could land the needed HW in my lab, which could also bring
> | support for the SW RAID on intel's)...
> 
> I have some patches for ICH5 for the IDE and SATA parts of it based
> on stable.  I haven't ported them to -current yet but I should be
> starting to work on that soon.  I have patches for the 6300ESB ICH
> as well.  They are basically the same SW wise except for pci ids.
> 
> There is nothing major in the patches except for PCI id's and
> reading the DMA setup.  I do have tweaks that read the SATA status
> registers and which drives are mapped to which ports.  This prevents
> system lock ups when the SATA drives go away.
> 
> I just got my hands a system that looks like it might have the Intel
> RAID in BIOS stuff to play with. 

If you get anything done let me know so we can get it reviewed and 
possibly committed to -current. I dont have patches for the 6300 here 
locally as well, thats just PCI ids...

-- 
-Søren



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405FD8FF.2070703>