From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 06:35:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC5216A4CE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:35:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4565443D64 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8F6ZTNf082668; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:35:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8F6ZDGq010396; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:35:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8F6ZCtx010395; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:35:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:35:12 +0200 From: Francois Tigeot To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20040915063512.GA10104@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <20040914150419.GA7191@aoi.wolfpond.org> <200409141543.13318.peter@wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409141543.13318.peter@wemm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bios.h question X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:35:35 -0000 On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:43:13PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Tuesday 14 September 2004 08:04 am, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > I'm running 5.3-BETA4 and I can't find even > > though bios(9) exists. > > It seems bios.h is only present on the i386 and alpha architectures. > > > > Is this normal on amd64 ? If yes, I would appreciate if someone could > > point me to an alternative to bios_sigsearch() > > We dont even have bios_sigsearch() - all the consumers in the kernel > were related to vm86()/bios16()/bios32() calls, which are impossible in > our kernel. This puzzles me, as the functions seem to be present on alpha. > What do you need it for? It might be ok to revive a subset of it, but > it would be useful to know what that file is being used for first, so > we know which subsets are needed. I am experimenting with Bruno Ducrot's powernow_k7 and need to read some tables in BIOS memory area. I will try to see if there is a way to do the same thing via acpi instead... -- Francois Tigeot