From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 20:05:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B558E16A419 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804F913C4D9 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (thor.farley.org [192.168.1.5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1DK5VQo029914; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:31 -0600 (CST) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <200802131938.m1DJc6xp072821@lava.sentex.ca> Message-ID: References: <200802131453.m1DErqO8071630@lava.sentex.ca> <47B334CD.1000200@barafranca.com> <200802131938.m1DJc6xp072821@lava.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (BSF 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.farley.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Hugo Silva Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386, ifstat and bsnmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:05:37 -0000 On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 01:40 PM 2/13/2008, Sean C. Farley wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Hugo Silva wrote: >> >>> Mike Tancsa wrote: >>>> Couple of little things I noticed with a new RELENG_7 AMD64 box (as >>>> of yesterday) >>>> ifstat from the ports cannot seem to find interfaces for some >>>> reason ? It works fine on i386 >> >> *snip* >> >> Try this patch. The type to the fourth argument to sysctl is wrong >> (int) and should be size_t. > > Thanks! That did the trick. Should I file or PR, or can you just > commit the patch ? That is good. I recommend filing a PR, so it will not get lost. Besides being behind on my own PR's :), I am still a src-committer-in-training--commits must be approved by my mentor--which adds to the lag. Thank you for taking care of the paperwork. Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org