From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 3 16:42:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA07491 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 16:42:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07271 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 16:41:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20113; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 23:17:22 GMT (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199802032317.XAA20113@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Brandon Gillespie cc: Brian Somers , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP + FIREWALL == does not work In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Feb 1998 08:41:41 MST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 23:17:21 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions" > So I can assume I dont need 'options IPDIVERT' in the kernel, do I also > not need 'options IPFIREWALL'? The manual isn't too clear about if I need > this or not... I'd assume neither, from the way its worded. It depends on your requirements. If you want to firewall, the ppp firewalling may or may not be sufficient. > Thanks :) > > -Brandon > -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....