From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 23 10:16:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6349F37B405 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (office.sbnd.net [217.75.140.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C3043F5B for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:16:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 20744 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Jan 2003 18:15:27 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:15:27 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Yar Tikhiy Cc: Ceri Davies , Julian Mayer , knu@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-20021216 Message-ID: <20030123181527.GB19722@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Yar Tikhiy , Ceri Davies , Julian Mayer , knu@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org References: <20030123081224.GA471@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20030123101216.GA2856@submonkey.net> <20030123134749.GA377@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20030123174706.GA8943@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030123175344.GC19717@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20030123181121.GB8943@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030123181121.GB8943@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:11:21PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Peter, here is a bit reworked version of your patch. > > > Does it look reasonable? > >=20 > > Yes, this looks fine; the data connection port issue was brought up by > > Matthew Seaman in a private message to me, which I did not respond to > > immediately, because I wanted to feel the general thoughts on the > > subject. Now that you have incorporated it into your patch, it all > > sounds great :) >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > > I see that you have also changed my '.Nm' macro for the 'ftp' service to > > '.Dq'; that's fine too, I was in quite a bit of doubt myself over > > exactly which mdoc macro to use. The '.Nm' came from the telnet(1) > > manual page, but it did not look quite right to me. > =20 > As far as I know mdoc, .Nm should be used once with an argument, > the subject of the page, and then it may be used with no argument > to refer to the subject since it remembers its argument. > Therefore excuse me, but your using ".Nm ftp" in the middle of the > page to refer to "ftp" as a TCP service wasn't quite correct :-) Yes, I know it wasn't; but a quick test revealed that at least with -STABLE's groff, '.Nm ftp' used in the middle of the ftpd manual page did not influence the further calls of '.Nm' without arguments - all the rest of the page correctly displayed 'ftpd' at each '.Nm' usage. Still, it was not correct, and I freely admit it :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 You have, of course, just begun reading the sentence that you have just fin= ished reading. --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+MDE/7Ri2jRYZRVMRAvrKAJ4rpiSv8Oa2lurdoCpnzimS+pRysgCffYwV PsFgViorJJm+BjJJQn6bWAY= =xAy4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message