From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 10 05:25:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA08625 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bdd.net (bdd.net [207.61.119.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA08620 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 05:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (james@localhost) by bdd.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA23153; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 08:25:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 08:25:21 -0400 (EDT) From: James FitzGibbon To: Dave Babler cc: Don Yuniskis , James FitzGibbon , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port of Majordomo v1.93 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 9 Jul 1996, Dave Babler wrote: > > Why did you opt for UID/GID of 67 (vs. the 54 suggested)... just curious. > > > I haven't looked at the port, but after much hair pulling my majordomo > installation was made with the majordomo "user" / POSIX model, which > requires the UDI/GID of whatever the created majordom account has... is > this not the 'right' way for FBDS? (The Makefile reference was to BSDI > being of that flavor, no direct reference to FBSD, of course). I think Don was just referring to the default Makefile using 54, whereas I chose 67. A personal thing. -- j. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | James FitzGibbon james@nexis.net | | Integrator, The Nexis Group Voice/Fax : 416 410-0100 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------