From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 21 16:55:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD1B16A420
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:55:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC76343D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:55:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1Ep7FR-0008Bp-FE
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:55:29 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:55:29 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1Ep7FR-0008Bp-FE@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: em bad performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:55:32 -0000

hi,
	this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets,
one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is
a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner).

the em performance under 6.0-stable is half of any other box i have,
and a similar mb running linux gives about 1GB, so

	Q: any ideas what can be wrong?

thanks,
	danny