From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 06:12:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9B51065670 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (svr20881129-177.ihostservers.net [208.81.129.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069F78FC28 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigguy.am-productions.biz (adsl-99-174-178-97.dsl.wotnoh.sbcglobal.net [99.174.178.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7R5gxeR011582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:42:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:45:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20100823134723.GC64651@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4880343.zCa5A4Wjn5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008270145.40699.mistry.7@osu.edu> Cc: Kostik Belousov , Ed Schouten , Ian FREISLICH Subject: Re: fusefs-kmod broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:12:41 -0000 --nextPart4880343.zCa5A4Wjn5 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 23 August 2010 10:57:40 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > So, in this case is the fusefs module broken? I'm guessing it is. > > I don't like the way fuse_fileops is initialised in fuse4bsd. I > > would prefer for the struct to be zeroed and then the fo_xxx > > implimented bits set as appropriate. That way when the struct is > > changed, you don't get stung again. >=20 > I am an idiot - that will have no effect. This patch needs to be > included in sysutils/fusefs-kmod/files Would you file a PR with the patch accounting for the correct=20 __FreeBSD_version__? Thanks, =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart4880343.zCa5A4Wjn5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkx3UQQACgkQxqA5ziudZT0PbQCgyzpcJSFupM20S5rsGh3osZw3 Nb8AnjO1XKofGyaNsqhRF8/AbXSjEjOK =ablL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4880343.zCa5A4Wjn5--