From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 18:48:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD10FD0 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FB92675 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6EImc9a029585 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:48:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191673] [ staging ] www/squid32 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:48:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: adamw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:48:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191673 --- Comment #6 from Adam Weinberger --- Dan, relax, you've contributed great patches and they'll all get committed soon enough. Our job is to flag anything unusual and talk it through with you before it gets committed. Don't confuse advice with negative criticism. If nobody thought your patches were quality stuff, you wouldn't be receiving advice. As far as the @sample business goes, nobody cares what method you use. But my job is to flag the fact that you didn't use it, and see whether it was intentional, or whether you just weren't aware of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.