Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:59:34 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> Cc: JD Arnold <jdarnold@buddydog.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? Message-ID: <fb6605670601091259h3414c16dhe744030ba4fc0fce@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <dptv94$7ft$1@sea.gmane.org> <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/06, Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> wrote: > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to > it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs > learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp > programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, > there isn't even a close competitor. Actually, I find Vim superior in most respects. I would use Emacs if someone would fix the broken modes that are accepted as best-in-class for most of the uses that I need. Meanwhile, Vim just works. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fb6605670601091259h3414c16dhe744030ba4fc0fce>