Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:11:47 +0530
From:      "Unix Tools" <unixtools@hotmail.com>
To:        "Marc Schneiders" <marc@schneiders.org>
Cc:        "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Why is this box so slow?
Message-ID:  <OE51fSp1J106zPpPku00000f84c@hotmail.com>
References:  <20020901153734.S89143-100000@voo.doo.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Get the outputof netstat and sockstat


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Schneiders" <marc@schneiders.org>
To: "Unix Tools" <unixtools@hotmail.com>
Cc: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>; <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 07:09 PM
Subject: Re: Why is this box so slow?


> On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, at 01:30 [=GMT+0530], Unix Tools wrote:
>
> > Could you please print your top output here,
>
> Below it is, while doing buildworld, which it is at since 15 hours,
> now building libperl.
>
> last pid: 89142;  load averages:  1.27,  1.11,  1.09  up 40+22:10:19
15:37:17
> 40 processes:  2 running, 38 sleeping
>
> Mem: 55M Active, 475M Inact, 71M Wired, 19M Cache, 73M Buf, 6280K Free
> Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free
>
>
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
> 89140 root      55   0  3976K  3884K RUN      0:14 68.90% 46.00% cc1
> 89139 root      -6   0  2220K  1856K pipdwt   0:06 16.97% 11.33% cpp0
> 29017 root       2   0  2456K  1752K select   1:46  1.56%  1.56% sshd
>    95 root       2   0  4480K  3928K select 338:03  0.00%  0.00% named
>   108 root       2   0  2352K  1492K select  88:57  0.00%  0.00% sshd
>    97 root       2   0  1332K   816K select  51:05  0.00%  0.00% ntpd
> 84007 nobody     2   0  1132K   812K select  12:46  0.00%  0.00% boa
>    92 root       2   0   960K   584K select  12:33  0.00%  0.00% syslogd
> 92235 root       2   0  2456K  1720K select   9:57  0.00%  0.00% sshd
>   178 root       2   0  2792K  2208K select   4:05  0.00%  0.00% named
>   106 root      10   0  1008K   664K nanslp   3:49  0.00%  0.00% cron
> 27475 root       2   0  3600K  2664K select   1:19  0.00%  0.00% named
> 34592 root       2   0  3016K  2408K select   0:47  0.00%  0.00% sendmail
>   114 smmsp     18   0  2812K  1704K pause    0:36  0.00%  0.00% sendmail
> 29009 root       2   0  2456K  1752K select   0:28  0.00%  0.00% sshd
> 97342 nobody     2   0  1860K  1520K kqread   0:28  0.00%  0.00% thttpd
>   152 root       2   0  3448K  2432K select   0:19  0.00%  0.00% snmpd
> 88818 root      10   0  1748K  1616K wait     0:09  0.00%  0.00% make
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marc Schneiders" <marc@schneiders.org>
> > To: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
> > Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 01:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: Why is this box so slow?
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 14:42 [=GMT-0400], Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > > >> (08.30.2002 @ 1157 PST): Marc Schneiders said, in 2.2K: <<
> > > > > > I did, and the load is low. There is more than enough RAM, swap
> > isn't
> > > > > > ever used. See top output below, with a remark: If I do not run
> > > > > > dnetc, it doesn't get better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > last pid: 28885;  load averages:  1.02,  1.08,  1.02  up
39+03:29:08
> > 20:56:06
> > > > > > 26 processes:  2 running, 24 sleeping
> > > > >
> > > > > that's a low load? i'd hate to see your system under a heavy load.
> > > > >
> > > > > i find it hard to believe that not running dnetc wouldn't improve
> > speed.
> > > > > dnetc is very CPU intensive, and will slow down a system.
> > > >
> > > > While that's true, I've found dnetc to be very un-intrusive.  I run
it
> > all
> > > > the time on my machines (dual P166's - yes, that's Pentium One) and
I
> > > > never have performance problems - it just adjusts it's priority when
I
> > > > come in to actually use the machine.
> > >
> > > That is my experience too, running it on two dual Pentium Pro
> > > machines.
> > >
> > > > One thing though - are you sure you've got dnetc configured to
> > > > run at the lowest priority (at-idle), so that it will give up the
> > > > CPU when it is needed for something else (thttpd, vi, etc)?
> > >
> > > Yes. And in any case, my problem does not diminish when I don't run
> > > dnetc.
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> > >
> >
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OE51fSp1J106zPpPku00000f84c>