Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:01:46 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: set kern.cam.scsi_delay to 2000ms on all platforms Message-ID: <422A732A-355A-4C18-9E8F-8C7D2EE9D122@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <4CC046B8.8000505@feral.com> References: <20101019221131.GA75368@freebsd.org> <63EF6D51-1196-43F1-8521-27756E972263@samsco.org> <20101021062150.GA20489@freebsd.org> <8B967C79-CD84-435C-9007-E33467DC92A9@samsco.org> <20101021135447.GC72290@freebsd.org> <4CC046B8.8000505@feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sure, but what's the plan for validating it? Too often this stuff goes = into HEAD with the best of intentions, and then it basically never = touched again until someone stumbles over it in an release. I'm not = against this change, I just want to know what engineering has gone into = it. Scott On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Now would be a good time to find out if there are issues. >=20 >> On Thu Oct 21 10, Scott Long wrote: >>> Ok, I've gotta be a stick in the mud and ask you how you've come to = the conclusion that 2000 is better than 5000. Can you provide your = evidence and/or testing results? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?422A732A-355A-4C18-9E8F-8C7D2EE9D122>