From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 14:57:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247EB106564A; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551168FC12; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e12so2771403lag.13 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=28K7FgCY6rXSwtJ5BxO7jwycuhZF7shiABOISj2/WUY=; b=LSBKdQaD/PFle7ZbYfnV3lBn3cDIjWduawWkpzEMXNsZ5m/0euJIchCZGReg+Gxdl+ Baa9bJIxRVL+TesV6DXeaaiwvP0jmLnlNdd0ev33eqWrkjNH1CiVRdUoyo3OzsCo6UgB 9dfhYq+q1Qop208FMKqkF9ifQrirgp+j7agdyXpLXa6rK44Cy7qHvVEOBIfYU1sMx9p4 SWO9CYF+FmcflHUmAn5JH28qEifEGc0VyZy/V434kALqV1IR0VboELrid55jlaMZQRzc 6X0BmEXUr4n69xiQohsUtAoWxujtmsz0bJbqlUQfha6U+99am6G6FamO/I3+t2ZpX9jl Ek2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.26.135 with SMTP id l7mr6904608lbg.84.1349708259245; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.101.234 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5065B873.4070509@omnilan.de> References: <20120829060158.GA38721@x2.osted.lan> <20120831052003.GA91340@x2.osted.lan> <20120905201531.GA54452@x2.osted.lan> <20120917140055.GA9037@x2.osted.lan> <5061F6E9.6030104@omnilan.de> <5062E0DE.70805@omnilan.de> <5065B873.4070509@omnilan.de> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:57:39 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sbekD6Y3GDejF1fO13_vgqMipis Message-ID: From: Attilio Rao To: Harald Schmalzbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD FS , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: attilio@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:57:41 -0000 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime): >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer >> wrote: >>> ... >> After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch >> that at least compiles there: >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch > > Thanks a lot! In the meantime I made the original patch compiling. I > simply looked at the changes which were made around july in the fuse > project to follow changes in head (checkpath(), vrecycle() and > vtruncbuf()) and "reverted" them. > Since I have no idea about the code I modified, I'm happy that you did a > more qualified patch set :-) > >> Of course, I didn't have a chance to test it because I'm also out for >> vacation right now but please do and report. > > Happy holiday!!! If you're by chance arround the Oktoberfest, drop me a > note, I'll pay you a Ma=C3=9F (or any other drink if you don't like > =E2=80=9EWiesnbier=E2=80=9C) :-) I really hoped to make this year, but no luck :/ >>> ... >>> Some questions: Is this planned to be mfc'd and if so, how can one know= ? >> In which sense "how can one know?". We usually specify MFC timeouts in >> the commit message (not sure if this answers your concerns). > > Yep, that's what I wanted to know. So if there's no MFC timeout in the > log, it's not intended to be MFCd ever I guess. > > Thanks a lot! > World/Kernel compiled fine in the meantime, I'll do some sshfs tests. Did you do any test in the end? Thanks, Attilio --=20 Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein