From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 11:18:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88B416A4B3 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.classy.jp (mail.classY.jp [202.33.21.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B908343FAF for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp) Received: from typhoon.co.jp (218.231.196.65.eo.eaccess.ne.jp [218.231.196.65]) (authenticated bits=0)h9HIIY1J001355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2003 03:18:52 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3F903278.4040701@typhoon.co.jp> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 03:18:32 +0900 From: "N. Fung" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200310171755.LAA29411@lariat.org> <200310171906.56692.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <200310171906.56692.howells@kde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.4; VAE 6.22.0.1; VDF 6.22.0.9 Subject: Re: Building a server TODAY; which version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:18:57 -0000 Chris Howells wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > On Friday 17 October 2003 18:55, Brett Glass wrote: > >>on it as well. But which version? 4.8-RELEASE with >>patches? 4.8-RELEASE-p13? > > > What's the difference between 4.8-RELEASE with patches and 4.8-RELEASE-p13 > anyway? > > >>4.x-STABLE? or is 4.9-RELEASE-RC2 > > > I think 4.x-STABLE (e.g. what you would of got if you cvsup to RELENG_4 a few > weeks ago) is currently tagged RC2. > > >>good enough to consider using? Opinions appreciated. > > > I can't think of many significant new things in 4.9 that are useful for > servers, ACPI is significant. If your machine is new, ACPI makes 4.9 worth the wait. Otherwise, go with 4.8p13. -eof-